Oct 9, 2011

Age of the Beholder

A friend of mine generously passes along her magazines to me. This bunch included Glamour (which she assured me she got by accident).

Anyway, this is the first time I’ve even glanced at a Glamour since college and I have to say that the scenery looks pretty different these days. I’m so uncool now that I don’t even think most of the outfits in Glamour are cute.

I’m not shocked by my lack of style, but I was taken aback by the age of a few of the “real life” ladies featured in the magazine. For instance, 30 year old Anne was photographed at a music festival wearing shorts so short that the pockets showed. (I thought it was telling that the women’s ages were even included along with their photos.)

I’m 31. I can’t really remember the last time I went to a music festival. I have however made quite a splash at the merry-go-round of four year old birthday parties this year.

It’s just interesting to see how different my reality is from the lives of these women. I’m not trying to say that one is better than the other. The pages of Glamour are exist in a parallel universe from the one I live in.

Anyway despite our differences, Glamour and I were having a pretty good time right until I came to a page that said this in giant font – “At 16 you can drive. At 18 you can vote. At 21 you can drink. At 25 you hit your quarter-life crisis. And then comes 30, when you suddenly irrevocably transform into…and Old Person. Right? Wrong”

Any magazine that feels the need to reassure me that 30 isn’t really old, can’t be my friend.

At first I was kind of pissed, but then I realized that I’m the one out of line here. I really have no business judging Glamour by my “old” standards (or reading it for that matter). I am clearly not their demographic. If I’m being really honest, I’m pretty sure my 20 year old self would judge my minivan lifestyle harshly so I shouldn't hold a fear of turning 30  against the current crop of 20 somethings.

But as somebody who has had a 30th birthday and survived, I just wish younger people knew that getting older has some awesome fringe benefits.

Most of us quit worrying so much what others think, which is so very liberating. You’ll likely discover the joys of classic style and quit wasting time and money on trends. You aren’t wasting energy figuring out what you want to be when you grow up – because you ALREADY are grown up.

There is beauty in leaving beyond the uncertainties of youth and finally figuring out who you really want to be.

So maybe my ass isn’t what it once was.  I wouldn’t trade the confidence of my 30s for the body of my 20s.

(Sorry Glamour – but we still can’t be friends. We aren’t good for each other.)

11 comments:

Jenners said...

Glamour is full of crap! I personally think things started getting much better in my 30s … and the 40s are even more liberating!

Sandee said...

It's a rag is that's their philosophy. I'm 60 and I'm doing just fine without them.

Have a terrific day. :)

Mom of 12 said...

I'm not a Glamour fan...call me old, out-of-date, whatever, but I'd much rather read Good Housekeeping.
Sandy

Formerly known as Frau said...

I'm not friends with Glamour anymore either...Unfortunately I'm BFF with MORE magazine it's for 40 and over...my sister gave me the subscription her way of letting me know I'm over 40!

sheila said...

WONDERFUL post! I don't read those magazines anymore. And let me tell you... 40 ? 40 is awesome!!!!!!

Connie said...

I finally stopped reading Glamour last year. You are right...I'm not the demographic.

I do enjoy Marie Claire however.

blueviolet said...

Clearly that article was written by someone who has yet to reach their 30's and see how awesome they are. The 30's are so much better than the 20's!

Lane said...

I'm turning 25 in November and I can say that I'm looking forward to it. Every year that I get older is a blessing. Each year I learn more about myself and I grow so much as a person. How could that be a bad thing? Great post! :)

Sprite's Keeper said...

I hit 35 last month. I can no longer claim to be in my low 30's. Surprisingly, to me at least, I am completely okay with that.

Casey said...

I didn't even read Glamour when I young and (supposedly) hip. No way I'd go there now.

M-Cat said...

I am ashamed that I was a Cosmo reader...and now at 45 I find it sad that young women like I was get sucked into it